“retrogaming”

  • Flying Squid
    link
    fedilink
    243 months ago

    This is, IMO, the only reason that this should have been stopped:

    All the devices were fitted with non-certified batteries and electrical circuits and did not meet EU technical or safety standards.

    Other than that, forget it. Nintendo and CAPCOM aren’t making significant amounts of money from Super Mario Bros. or Street Fighter II.

    • @ASDraptor@lemmy.autism.place
      link
      fedilink
      English
      93 months ago

      Fact is these devices are not illegal because they can run retro games. What is illegal is selling them with the games inside.

      If the batteries were not legally compliant, that’s a whole different matter. But the article puts the focus on how they could play “licensed” games and were illegal when that’s a blatant lie. These consoles are completely legal (from a copyright standpoint) if they are sold without any games and you then get the games by yourself.

    • @PugJesus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      33 months ago

      Aren’t these things usually expensive because they’re being passed off as genuine collector’s items?

      • Flying Squid
        link
        fedilink
        33 months ago

        Possibly, although the article was not clear on that point. That would definitely be a legal issue. I just object to the ROMs part.

  • @Kethal@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    5
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    What’s with the wording used in this article, fake, imitation? They look like the original games. If someone copied a book and sold it, violating copyright laws, you wouldn’t call it a fake book.