=T I don’t mean to be depressing, but courts don’t limit police power.

Police are an extension of the courts’ power.

  • enkers
    link
    fedilink
    3
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    This is why I have a button mapping to hard lock (aka system lock) my phone. I also, set it to hard lock every n days as well.

    Ideally you hard lock all the time, but there’s often a tradeoff between security and useability.

      • @deo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        22 months ago

        My phone will require a passcode if my fingerprint doesn’t register enough times in a row. Maybe you can get similar functionality to what you want by just only registering one of your thumbs or something? I can’t find anyway to turn the number of allowed failures down, though…

      • enkers
        link
        fedilink
        12 months ago

        That’s a decent alternative, but it’s got two problems that make it a worse option:

        First, it’s hard to do without looking, like if it’s in your pocket. Also, if someone is watching you, or trying to compel you to unlock your phone, they’ll have a chance to stop you if they’re paying attention.

        Second, that doesn’t actually work for me on my version of Android. xD

        • @Epsilion@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          1
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          At least on samsung, its a setting you have to enable - “Show Lockdown option” under “Secure lock settings”

          Once enabled, it shows up in the power off menu.

    • @alphanerd4@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      1
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      well yeah, but they didn’t use that anywhere in their legal justification. they’re claiming the authority to treat anyone in this way.

  • @alphanerd4@lemmy.worldOPM
    link
    fedilink
    1
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    i once saw a squad of correctional officers break a mans jaw open because he refused a DNA test, and that was like 5 years ago, in case anyone was wondering why I treat court rulings like this as purely retroactive legalization of behavior that is already commonplace.