• @kescusay@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    483 months ago

    Huh. I wonder what they have against being anti-bullying? It can’t possibly be because of some other facet of his identity that cannot be changed, right? I mean, if it were, that would probably be a violation of his rights and he might have grounds to sue.

    • ivanafterall
      link
      fedilink
      393 months ago

      citing his ‘lifestyle’

      No attempt to even hide it, in this case.

      • anon6789
        link
        fedilink
        English
        35
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Ehhemmm…I believe she specifically said it was his choice of lifestyle. She made her stance very clear. 😮‍💨

        “It’s not discriminating against his lifestyle — that’s his choice,” Potteiger said in the meeting. “But it’s him speaking about it.”

        I’m just glad this wasn’t one of my local schools this time. We at least ran them out of the school boards here. This is off in the Pennsyltucky part of the state.

  • @Skullgrid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    303 months ago

    this is cancel culture run amok, can’t be anything these days without conservatives stamping all over your freedom.

  • Optional
    link
    fedilink
    English
    213 months ago

    Is that some moms-for-liberty school board, or, just like a regular cloven-hooved mouth-breather school board