@return2ozma@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world • 7 months agoReturn to office is ‘dead,’ Stanford economist says. Here’s whywww.cnbc.comexternal-linkmessage-square49fedilinkarrow-up1347arrow-down111cross-posted to: futurology@futurology.todaytechnology@lemmy.worldhackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fanshackernews@derp.foo
arrow-up1336arrow-down1external-linkReturn to office is ‘dead,’ Stanford economist says. Here’s whywww.cnbc.com@return2ozma@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world • 7 months agomessage-square49fedilinkcross-posted to: futurology@futurology.todaytechnology@lemmy.worldhackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fanshackernews@derp.foo
minus-square@psud@aussie.zonelinkfedilink1•7 months agoGovernment doesn’t help much with court, except where they change the law
minus-square@Kecessa@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilink0•edit-27 months agoThat’s what I meant, why should we need to go to court to get that right recognized when it should be the government changing the law without court intervention?
Government doesn’t help much with court, except where they change the law
That’s what I meant, why should we need to go to court to get that right recognized when it should be the government changing the law without court intervention?