What are your ideas, that if you could implement would likely stop our species from warring so much?

I’m asking for a reasonable ones, but if not - at least make them funny :P

  • AshDene
    link
    fedilink
    41 year ago

    A single world spanning country.

    If we don’t kill ourselves off first it will probably happen eventually. Country sized used to be limited by things like communication latency, and the time it took to move forces around. Technology has shrunk the world so that those things no longer matter. The natural size limit on a country is almost certainly as large as the earth now.

    It won’t happen soon, cultures will take time to become similar enough to merge. Leadership structures take time to be absorbed into a greater one (EU style) or have to forcefully taken over (Chechnya style, thankfully very rare these days). But with no real impediment to countries growing larger, it will happen eventually. With no-one able to fund or support rebellion and modern technology making police actions extremely effective it may well last effectively forever.

    Whether it’s a democratic utopia, a dictatorial nightmare, or something in between for the common citizen is not yet defined. Either way, war, as in peer to peer conflict between sovereigns, will be over.

    • 🇺🇦 Max UL
      link
      fedilink
      21 year ago

      Well, you can still get civil war in that scenario right, or just mass strife and protests which can grow into warlike movements.

      • AshDene
        link
        fedilink
        1
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        With the capability of modern surveillance technology (making it extremely hard to organize a rebellion), and the sophistication of modern weaponry (making it extremely hard to arm an army without state support) it strikes me as unlikely that you would ever get civil war in a single country world.

        Civil war is already incredibly rare with plenty of outside actors happy to support trouble.

        I certainly don’t rule out mass strife and protests, but the question was about war, not suffering.