• @Whirlybird@aussie.zone
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    19 months ago

    And with how vague the voice constitutional change was, it would be able to be dismantled in every meaningful way another 11 times in the future. It would just have to exist, but it could have been comprised of a 19 year old white intern who supported anti-indigenous things.

      • @Whirlybird@aussie.zone
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        19 months ago

        Says the person saying how frequently they’re disbanded 😂. You’re literally arguing against yourself.

        • @Ilandar@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          29 months ago

          There is a clear political difference between abolishing a body that has been purely legislated versus one that Australians have directly voted in favour of establishing through a referendum.

          • @Whirlybird@aussie.zone
            cake
            link
            fedilink
            29 months ago

            I don’t say it would be abolished, just that it could and likely would essentially be completely gutted many times over because like I said, the only thing that’s protected is the thing existing.

          • @Whirlybird@aussie.zone
            cake
            link
            fedilink
            09 months ago

            I don’t say it would be abolished, just that it could and likely would essentially be completely gutted many times over because like I said, the only thing that’s protected is the thing existing.

            • @Ilandar@aussie.zone
              link
              fedilink
              19 months ago

              I don’t say it would be abolished

              You literally just quoted me with regards to this as part of your argument. Stop shifting the goalposts.