• @MomoTimeToDie@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      -19 months ago

      Just because you want to change the topic of discussion to a strawman it doesn’t mean it’s what we are discussing.

      Besides, you’re the only one kidding around here, making up bogus accusations to discredit criticism

      • Primarily0617
        link
        fedilink
        09 months ago

        you just threw out a strawman, got told to stay on topic, then accused the other person of strawmanning your argument because they stayed on topic rather than responding to your strawman

          • Primarily0617
            link
            fedilink
            0
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            i guess we can add “reading comprehension” to your list of special talents

              • Primarily0617
                link
                fedilink
                09 months ago

                oh no somebody’s using words they don’t understand

                give me the definition of a strawman argument, then explain how that was one

                • @MomoTimeToDie@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  19 months ago

                  A strawman argument is where they put up a false version of the argument I was making and argue against it instead. Such as pretending I was arguing media should have zero message whatsoever, instead of the actual argument I was making, which was that entertainment should be a higher priority than the message

                  • Primarily0617
                    link
                    fedilink
                    0
                    edit-2
                    9 months ago

                    ok i think i get it, so for example making the argument be about “shows shouldn’t prioritise pushing a message over quality” when that’s completely irrelevant to the topic at hand would be an example of a strawman argument, yes?

                    also i’m still waiting on an answer for what message the show is pushing