• mriguy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    2 years ago

    We look at the definition of treason in the Constitution, conclude that unless we can prove she’s acting on behalf of a foreign power, it isn’t treason, call it sedition, which it clearly IS, and go from there.

    • atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      20
      ·
      2 years ago

      Clearly eh?

      “Sedition usually involves actually conspiring to disrupt the legal operation of the government and is beyond expression of an opinion or protesting government policy.”

      I love when liberals just want to throw out the first amendment…