One library faces a $100,000 bill. Is there a way to fight back?

  • Contextual Idiot@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    They allocated up to $100,000 according to the article. The real cost isn’t known yet, but they are estimating it could cost up to $100,000.

    • CanIFishHere@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      I’d like to know how that figures. The staff to do it are already being paid. I Didn’t read anywhere additional staff would be required.

      • Contextual Idiot@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        The staff are already being paid to do other tasks. This would be an added responsibility, on top of the current responsibilities of their job role. So that would either take away from those original responsibilities, or add more paid hours to complete the new responsibilities. It could also mean they have to hire new staff, or bring in temporary staff to manage the responsibilities, should the other staff be unable to.

        We are getting into the realm of possibility here, since we don’t know the full cost or scope.

        • Toast@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          Adding to that, there are obvious logistics involved.

          Many libraries won’t already have an area to house these books compliant with the law, so renovations may be needed to accommodate.

          Books also don’t sort themselves. These need to be identified, catalogued appropriately, returns need to be separated, and so on. Libraries generally aren’t swimming in free space, and complying with this could require new carts/bins.

          Like you said, most of the details aren’t widely available. I could see how this would add up pretty rapidly though.

        • CanIFishHere@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Exactly. So the task is being done by staff that are already being paid. To say it incurs an additional cost is being disengenuous.