How the fuck is it always seemmngly a discretionary matter where the owner values "I know him/her over the reaity that its a ticking time bomb that will instantly bankrupt them when it inevitably goes off

  • Jumbie@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    2 months ago

    It’s not a debate.

    It’s pitbulls destroying communities and the pit nuts defending it and expecting everyone to help them lie about the danger.

    • Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      As someone who’s worked with dogs for decades, the blindness you demonstrate is sad.

      Ever seen a terrier go into a rage? Guessing not.

      There’s lots more at play here than your simplistic “breed bad”.

      • ScoffingLizard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        Getting pissed about all these small dogs biting mine. There was a neighbor with a pitt and he wasn’t aggressive, but they let it shit on my lawn. Air horns resolve both quickly.

      • BCsven@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        The trouble that an ER doctor conveyed was while they see more bites from larger dogs like retrievers etc, the pitbull bites were always severe tissue damage or deadly.

      • Jumbie@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        2 months ago

        As someone that can read and has eyes, it’s crazy watching pit apologists make excuses for this dangerous and unnecessary breed.

        There’s a reason why entire countries ban these monsters.

        This stupid excuse that “a small dog has issues therefore pitbulls aren’t dangerous” is just infuriating.