Giant black holes were supposed to be bit players in the early cosmic story. But recent James Webb Space Telescope observations are finding an unexpected abundance of the beasts.

  • @webghost0101@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    711 months ago

    The things we see are from a millions years ago, who knows where or how big these are right now, might not even exist any more.

    • @WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1011 months ago

      *Billions (13,000+ million). Based on our current understanding and their close proximity to each other in the early universe, most of them would have likely merged and many/most may be now at a size where it would take a google years to evaporate. The extremely small ones that did not merge may have already evaporated.

      Source: Hawking radiation

        • @WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          I thought so too but apparently the length of time it takes a black hole to evaporate is based on mass and those with a low mass — as in, the mass of the moon — should have already evaporated. Only supermassive black holes are the ones likely to take a google years to evaporate.

          Edit: none of the ones pictured are that small. We probably couldn’t detect them for hundreds/thousands of years (e.g. until solar system sized telescopes).

          • @chimerical@toast.ooo
            link
            fedilink
            110 months ago

            According to this calculator a black hole the size of the moon would take 584,745,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 years. I’m always open to correction though. (5.84745E44)