• @chiliedogg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    51 month ago

    You really don’t understand how expensive underground cables are. You know those big, huge steel transmission towers that you see lined up, hundreds in a row?

    Those towers costs hundreds of thousands or millions of dollars each. And the reason they’re used is because that’s way cheaper than underground.

    Shit - just the cable is a couple million per mile per cable.

    • @drake
      link
      English
      -91 month ago

      Are you fucking serious? Nuclear power plants cost way fucking more than some cables. You people are fundamentally so unserious. Pull your head out of a reactor for ten seconds and take reality as it exists

      • @chiliedogg@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        71 month ago

        Yes. They cost more than some cables. But we aren’t talking about wiring a stereo.

        A new nuclear unit (4 billion-ish) costs about as much as 2,000 miles of transmission-grade cable (about 2 million per mile). Considering that there’s about 30 cables on a tower run, you’re looking at around 65 miles’ worth of cable for the cost of a nuclear unit.

        And that’s just the cost of the wire. No towers, no conduit, no substations, no land acquisition (aerial easement and underground are very different things), no labor.

        • partial_accumen
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 month ago

          A new nuclear unit (4 billion-ish)

          In the USA the most recent two reactors (2 added to a plant that already had 2 existing) cost $34 billion just for the two new ones. source