The new law permits pedestrians to cross a roadway at any point, including outside of a crosswalk. It also allows for crossing against traffic signals and specifically states that doing so is no longer a violation of the city’s administrative code. But the new law also warns that pedestrians crossing outside of a crosswalk do not have the right of way and that they should yield to other traffic that has the right of way.

  • Count Regal Inkwell
    link
    fedilink
    English
    591 day ago

    “Jaywalking” being a crime is such a fundamentally brainrot thing

    The law here in Brazil, not that anyone follows it, but it basically follows the logic of “the smaller you are, the more of a right of way you have”. I.e. theoretically, a car should ALWAYS stop or slow itself to save a pedestrian or cyclist or even a motorcyclist

    … Again, not that anyone follows it, but it IS on the paper.

    • @jagged_circle@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      210 hours ago

      That’s the same logic in the US. Except everyone yields to animals, because you can’t tell a horse or a mule not to trample that person who walks next to them

    • @Mossheart@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      517 hours ago

      It would be nice if this was followed but the reality of the world is the opposite. It’s right of weight, not right of way.

    • merde alorsOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1222 hours ago

      the term used here is “vulnerable”. Vulnerability gives you priority