Supreme Court Justice John Roberts has been left “shaken” by the unexpected public reaction to his ruling in the Donald Trumppresidential immunity case, a columnist wrote Friday.

Slate’s judicial writer Dahlia Lithwick wrote that Roberts was left shocked that Americans didn’t buy his attempt to persuade them that his ruling was not about Trump, but instead focused on the office of the presidency. The court ruled that a president was largely immune from criminal prosecution for official actions.

Lithwick referenced a report by CNN’s Joan Biskupic. He “was shaken by the adverse public reaction to his decision affording [Donald] Trump substantial immunity from criminal prosecution," she wrote.

"His protestations that the case concerned the presidency, not Trump, held little currency.”

    • @mwguy@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      048 minutes ago

      Because every 8th grade civics course says the same thing. You punish Presidents with impeachment.

      • Vanon
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        I can only imagine the kind of impenetrable bubble this extremely small, privileged group of people live in. Especially after a decade or more.

        Making up (increasingly unprecedented) rules that 1/3 of a billion people must live by. With no possible repercussions for corruption, incoherence, anything. We should’ve been very careful who we added to this court. Extremist christian fascists using a useful idiot to replace over 1/3 of court (so far!) is a nuclear bomb waiting to explode.

      • @rockSlayer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        32
        edit-2
        17 hours ago

        Unbelievably, he managed to underestimate the political awareness of the US public to his office. The bar was already on the floor.