@FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone to Fuck Cars@lemmy.worldEnglish • 2 months agoTo help you decide on your next daily driverlemmy.worldimagemessage-square41fedilinkarrow-up1378arrow-down118file-textcross-posted to: noncredibledefense@sh.itjust.works
arrow-up1360arrow-down1imageTo help you decide on your next daily driverlemmy.world@FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone to Fuck Cars@lemmy.worldEnglish • 2 months agomessage-square41fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: noncredibledefense@sh.itjust.works
minus-square@borf@lemmynsfw.comlinkfedilinkEnglish8•edit-22 months agoBarely a head taller than the vehicle tires, so no, they are not on the tall side If you meant “short side” consider the ages of the children and the fact that 5 and 3 year olds do exist in the real world
minus-square@Hawke@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish6•2 months agoThe pic is confusing because they used similar visual cues for vehicle “hood height” compared to child “distance from vehicle”.
Barely a head taller than the vehicle tires, so no, they are not on the tall side
If you meant “short side” consider the ages of the children and the fact that 5 and 3 year olds do exist in the real world
The pic is confusing because they used similar visual cues for vehicle “hood height” compared to child “distance from vehicle”.