@renzev@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@lemmy.mlEnglish • 11 days agoAI's take on XMLlemmy.worldimagemessage-square135fedilinkarrow-up11.24Karrow-down122cross-posted to: programmerhumor@lemmy.world
arrow-up11.22Karrow-down1imageAI's take on XMLlemmy.world@renzev@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@lemmy.mlEnglish • 11 days agomessage-square135fedilinkcross-posted to: programmerhumor@lemmy.world
minus-square@AeonFelis@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish19•10 days agoXML is good for markup. The problem is that people too often confuse “markup” and “serialization”.
minus-square@bss03@infosec.publinkfedilink3•10 days agoToo redundant, just use S-exprs. (Mostly joking, but in some cases…)
minus-squareDr. BluefalllinkfedilinkEnglish2•10 days agoUnironically. Given the choice between S-expressions and XML, I will choose S-expressions.
XML is good for markup. The problem is that people too often confuse “markup” and “serialization”.
Too redundant, just use S-exprs.
(Mostly joking, but in some cases…)
Unironically.
Given the choice between S-expressions and XML, I will choose S-expressions.