• @jet@hackertalks.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    12 months ago

    If they can have no control of the underlying corporation why bother owning it? Why not just put it on the free market then?

    Obviously owning it does give some level of control, boards of directors can have opinions, the principal investors can set directives

    • NaN
      link
      English
      6
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Because it’s for fundraising, and they maintain very generic vibe setting, and they know Elon Musk won’t buy it.

      The Foundation literally cannot focus on the browser, so what’s your continuing problem here?

      • @jet@hackertalks.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        12 months ago

        That the Mozilla organization as a whole, including the foundation, has lost track of what is actually good for a free and open internet. And it makes me sad

        • NaN
          link
          English
          52 months ago

          What is good is not letting unethical corporations and only unethical corporations develop cutting edge technologies because me Firefox user and me not like anything ever change.

          Cat’s out of the bag, nothing ever goes back the way it was, you just get to live in the new world.

          • @jet@hackertalks.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            02 months ago

            Agreed the world is forever moving forward. Mozilla is being left behind.

            To close the loop on this whole discussion, the Mozilla foundations executive director hire was posted to a Firefox community, Firefox being owned by the Mozilla corporation. Clearly there is cross concern between these organizations, otherwise the post would not have been made here, you wouldn’t have read it, and you wouldn’t have been able to respond to it.

            • NaN
              link
              English
              52 months ago

              Pretty much every time the foundation does anything a crapton of people complain about how it has nothing to do with the browser.

              Then more people comment and complain about Mozilla doing advocacy, or making a podcast, and how those resources should’ve gone into the browser, because they too have no idea there’s a difference.

              And it doesn’t help that the corporation and foundation are collectively referred to in press as Mozilla with no distinction.