• Tar_Alcaran
      link
      fedilink
      English
      123 months ago

      Obviously not. But switching to something new and worse also clearly isn’t the solution.

      • @danekrae@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -8
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Not something new? That seems a bit odd?

        Try to answer the question people… What is the fucking solution?! You can’t just say “no” to everything, then “I have no suggestions”, but “don’t use new things” and “we shouldn’t use what we do”.

        I’m not advocating for gas, oil or coal. Is the answer nuclear energy, solar, wind? Instead of just downvoting, try to use your words.

        • Amputret
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          English
          103 months ago

          Just because something is new doesn’t mean it’s better or should be used. Just look at crypto.

            • Tar_Alcaran
              link
              fedilink
              English
              73 months ago

              No, bad is bad. There are other solutions, such as electric power, biofuels, etc. everything has downsides, but those are generally less bad with CO2 than the rest.

              • @danekrae@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                -13 months ago

                You answered my question now, that I asked a few comments ago, thank you.

                I don’t know if it was you, but why downvote the question? People trying to kill questions to a very important subject seems moronic to me.

                • Tar_Alcaran
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  53 months ago

                  I’m not down voting you, they’re decent questions to ask. It’s just that the people asking them are usually the “well, you can’t solve 100% of the problem, so I should do whatever I want” crowd.