“Better” and “decide for me”. You seem to have missed those.

Also funnily enough, your comrade answered differently than you.

Is there opposition within the overlapping negative space? In the places they each say “this space intentionally left blank”?

If anarchism is horizontal and decentralized, is communism vertical and centralized? It’s not what you said, but those seems like truer opposites.

Are the origins of anarchism and communism entirely separate or are they diverging refinements on a common base? Are all of those refinements really changes in category and none of them in specificity?

I guess my claim is changed now, from “anarchism and communism are compatible” to a person can live a life aligned with anarchism or communism without entirely reinventing themselves during transitions between".

Though this is well away from “Haha enjoy getting raided” feeling eerily similar to the liberal “Enjoy the camps, transes”. Not the same rationally as the power relationship is wildly different, but feels similar.

I’ve never claimed to be an anarchist, but I will claim that you cannot know the thoughts of another better than themselves, nor that you can decide for me to accept your opinion when I’ve asked for another’s.

Do you see fascism and anarchism as equally distant from communism? If not, is that distance entirely unrelated to the parts of each?

I guess if they are defined alone by what makes them unique, then rather than them being incompatible or compatible, it is more that compatibility is a category error.

I guess I’m considering the overlaps in the massive negative space for each.

The implication was that you could not answer the question because it was not directed at you. You were quite clear.

May you one day be capable of more than assuming and skimming. If that isn’t written plainly enough, there is little hope.

That doesn’t directly answer the question or the context.

If anarchists and communists can work together politically towards goals positive for both, I argue that as a binary anarchism and communism cannot be incompatible.

Is there no human foundation shared between and no collective label that can apply to both?

Are an-coms on the same level as an-caps to you?

This broken ping pong chain of people is aggravating. You are mostly fine other than your assumption essay, but good lord.

The mind reading goes both ways. How am I to know that a misreading is a misreading and not bad faith? How did you connect rhyme/parallel to siding?

If not for the fact that communists in much of the world don’t have much political space below them, I’d say the meme is punching down. I can’t see that and stereotyping as anything but either useless or aiding capitalists by creating toxicity in anticapitalist places. I cannot see the meme as anything but needlessly mean-spirited.

Am I truly so incomprehensible? I cannot comprehend my initial reply containing so much information about myself to fuel two useful and well-thought, lengthy replies without baseless assumptions. Nor can I understand the effort put in or joy taken from writing so much when a question of less than ten words could have sufficed. So I can do nothing but assume the opposite.

You cannot help but collapse the context or at best come in running without taking a second to see if your sermon was even applicable.

The person I replied to, not you, took my critique of a meme and brought up revolution and you have inserted yourself ignorant of the context. I’m not in here smearing communism even as anarchism is being smeared.

You are so wonderfully erudite that my lumpen self cannot help but bask in your secondhand smoke.

Is it lost on you that the meme rhymes or is parallel with memes from reactionary conservatives or do you just disagree? To me it looks like when the news focused on the little damage during BLM in order to claim complete wreckage.

Ignorant memeing ain’t praxis or revolution. Anarchism and communism (even from ML roots) aren’t incompatible. I guess I shouldn’t expect cowbee grade responses from everyone or that humans could ever stop themselves from acting human.

Yes.

Prolife level bait. Capitalists don’t need help defending their unjust hierarchy.

Could you not try and launder Omarchy?

Who knew that people can be primed?

Also, the typical person has a much form as “AI slop” and their opinions are often of little value outside consensus or aggregate.