nailingjello

Yep, you could probably assume they named their town after themselves. Whoever they are.

Short answer is Capitalism

This sounds like an episode of Bojack Horseman

Text for the lazy.

Duverger’s Law

In political science, Duverger’s law holds that single-ballot plurality-rule elections (such as first past the post) structured within single-member districts tend to favor a two-party system.

Duverger’s law is the reason why U.S. voters select one of the two leading candidates when voting tactically, even if a third-party candidate would better represent their interests. This behavior arises out to fear of vote splitting

One consequence of Duverger’s law is that you can improve the viability of third-party candidates by changing the voting system. For example, Approval voting is more resistant to vote splitting and therefore more conducive to third-party candidates.

But DDR4 compatible CPUs are raising in price

He lost a boxing match

Seems like he deserved it.

Much appreciated

If no one has claimed Injustice 2, I’d be interested. Thank you for doing this.

Be sure to flip this out at your local diner. Bonus points if you hand the waiter back their butter knife back first.

As someone who gravitates towards irreverent Christmas songs and considers themselves at least a casual Monty Python fan, I’m sad that I had never come across this song until now. Adding it to my collection. Thanks for posting.

Based on their comment above I asked if the following assumptions were correct. They appeared to confirm them:

It sounds like you are saying that if a drunk cyclist hits a pedestrian, it’s impossible for the pedestrian to get injured.

Or if that same cyclist weaves out in to the street, a car that hits them cannot be damaged (and the driver of the car won’t be held liable even though cyclists pretty much always have the right of way vs. cars).

Are you saying there are recorded facts that agree with their assumptions? Could you please provide a source?

Thanks for confirming my assumptions above. I don’t agree.

It sounds like you are saying that if a drunk cyclist hits a pedestrian, it’s impossible for the pedestrian to get injured.

Or if that same cyclist weaves out in to the street, a car that hits them cannot be damaged (and the driver of the car won’t be held liable even though cyclists pretty much always have the right of way vs. cars).

Thanksfor the recap, this really helped. Loved the originals, I’ll just stick to rewatching them.

If you poop out the stolen item, I think we can move past calling them a “suspected” thief.

Jokes on them, I use a Trace Buster Buster Buster

Fun fact, the songs It’s Raining Men and Let the Bodies Hit the Floor may have been written about the same event.