• 0 Posts
  • 58 Comments
Joined 3 months ago
cake
Cake day: October 10th, 2025

help-circle

  • I’ll break it down for you, since reading comprehension is difficult.

    Whatbaoutism does not mean (X is worse, therefore Y is fine)

    Whataboutism is also anything that shifts the context of the narrative. As you did by switching it from lobsters to disabled people in the UK. One has nothing to do with the other. You are attempting whataboutism wrapped in a hypocrisy tortilla.

    Thank you for also noting that the proposal was vile, so you can agree its a vile act to boil lobsters alive as you finally noted in the end of your response, yes?

    Its also nice to see you claim that appeal to nature fallacy, but it is clear you again have no reading comprehension or you would have landed in the ballpark of what I did is called descriptive contrast.

    You entirelt deflected because nothing you added was context related to the topic.

    You d-e-f-l-e-c-t-e-d

    Humans have moral agency. Lobsters have not been proven or shown to have that, therefore we can not judge or dictate what or how a lobster does anything. We can, however, demand ethical scrutiny regardless of their own behavior.