Maybe I would

1. Create a file called pdfs.html
2. Add embedded PDFs

   <embed src="pdf1.pdf"></embed>
   <embed src="pdf2.pdf"></embed>
   <embed src="pdf3.pdf"></embed>
   

3. Maybe give it a container div with display grid for min size and useful layout
4. Open the HTML file in my webbrowser Firefox

To generate the embed codes for every PDF file in a folder I would use my command line shell Nushell, which generates the embeds for all files for me.

ls *.pdf | each {|x| $'<embed src="($x.name)"></embed>'} | str join

Why would I add a line break when I don’t want or need a line break? It’s a list item, not a text paragraph.

I define the layout and spacing in CSS for the li element.

I don’t think I’ve ever noticed this as prevalent or common. If at all then as a strange outlier.

If it’s a list item with line breaks, sure. But the linked diff adds it at the end of the li with no content following. And it does so on the previous li. Leading to a line diff on a to this unrelated item.

Diff of the new terms

They add a <br> inside the <li>? wth

Messy layouting

I haven’t heard or read any such thing, and the EU passed legislation regarding AI regulation. Which seems like the opposite of those claims.

I really don’t see how it’s a dishonest question.

Alternative: go-away

They were shouted down and called Luddites.

By whom and where?

Challenging unbalanced mindsets may be important or even necessary, though.

Are you talking about a specific company or AI in general? Because first it sounded like the latter, but now it sounds like the former.

I’ve always been surprised by cost numbers mentioned in services and donation requests.

I run my own cheap server which has game servers running in the past, and some other services. I’ve not run any busy services though or fediverse content so I never felt like I could make a reasonable assessment. Just be surprised.

Seems to be two different efforts/solutions.

However U.S. law puts the copyright in the hands of the creator of it, NOT Reddit.

Users give Reddit a license to handle and publish the comments under their terms. I don’t remember the specific terms. It may allow Reddit to pursue this, specifically when the content is being consumed from Reddit.

Special Circles
Circular elements reflect the heritage of the Braille Institute.

I’m confused by this “feature” of the font.

Is it something that turned out to be there, and they make a connection to it? I wouldn’t add it to the list of features, right next to intentional design. It’s confusing.

Is it intentional design? Then I don’t get it, what it means or is for.

I’ll appreciate some paragraphs. Then it won’t be nearly as bad. Hopefully. Maybe. If they don’t repeat the same content in other words.

ok

It does show that it can be a useful tool, though.

Here, the security researcher was evaluating it and stumbled upon a previously undiscovered security bug. Obviously, they didn’t let the AI create the bug report without understanding it. They verified the answer and took action themselves, presumably analyzing, verifying, and reporting in a professional and respectful way.

The cURL AI spam is an issue at the opposite side of that. But doesn’t really tell us anything about capabilities. It tells us more about people. In my eyes, at least.

Should posts like this have [Satire] added to the title?

I’d prefer them to be obvious. Just like we title posts to describe them, and put them into communities, mark them nsfw or not, whether it’s satire or not is an important differentiator.

Seeing him on German TV in a documentary was surprising.

Given uBlock Origin and Firefox native privacy functionality, what do you install and use Privacy Badger for? Isn’t there nothing left for it to do?

But do you use a master password? You can forget those!

There’s a public petition - separate from the employee petition