I think it’s a very unique and creative idea! I like it! 😊
Kalcifer
All of this user’s content is licensed under CC BY 4.0.
- 144 Posts
- 1.59K Comments
Joined 2 years ago
Cake day: October 20th, 2023
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
2·7 days agoA litteral gaze of raccoons.
2·11 days agoYou’re welcome! 😊
IDK if they’re “Fediverse specific”, but I love SSTF’s (@setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world) art.
Neo-neolithic? 😜
21·13 days agoWhat benefit is there for that to be publicly viewable?
How were they caught? Did Wikipedia reveal user data to the authorities when prompted?
12·1 month ago[…] sh.itjust.works will fall under the Fedecan umbrella and will share common […] policies
Does this mean changes to the ToS, defederation practices, etc.?
2·1 month agoCould you please define exactly what you mean by “left-wing”?
1·2 months agoWhat client are you using?
I use Lemmy UI [1], Tesseract [2], and Thunder [3].
References
- Type: Repository. Name: “lemmy-ui”. Publisher: [“LemmyNet”. “GitHub”]. Published: 2025-04-02T16:19:00.000Z (Commit: “74864c165ca799d141314ec1d1c2d0ecf7f64b7a”). Accessed: 2025-04-03T08:06Z. URI: https://github.com/LemmyNet/lemmy-ui.
- Type: Repository. Name: “tesseract”. Publisher: [“asimons04”. “GitHub”]. Published: 2025-03-20T12:16:39.000Z (Commit: c49e93a74c20d352174afca80105b6d941d3cb12). Accessed: 2025-04-03T08:08Z. URI: https://github.com/asimons04/tesseract.
- Type: Repository. Name: “thunder”. Publisher: [“thunder-app”. “GitHub”]. Published: 2025-04-02T18:45:10.000Z. (Commit: 2e7b9127a1aff210d0a2af32aafdff554e73aef5). Accessed: 2025-04-03T08:09Z. URI: https://github.com/thunder-app/thunder.
[…] Boost is totally screwing up the references display
Yeah, I’ve heard report of that bug in Boost before [1] [2].
Out of curiosity, what does it look like for you?
References
- Type: Comment. Author: “Kalcifer” (“@Kalcifer@sh.itjust.works”). Publisher: [Type: Post. Title: “Happy #GlobalSwitchDay”. Author: “@squirrel@discuss.tchncs.de”. Publisher: [“Fediverse” (“!fediverse@lemmy.world”). “sh.itjust.works”. Lemmy.]. Published: 2025-02-01T07:08:40Z. URI: https://sh.itjust.works/post/32046509.]. Published: 2025-02-02T04:56:40Z. Accessed: 2025-04-03T07:51Z. URI: https://sh.itjust.works/post/32046509/16441818.
- Type: Comment. Author: “Kalcifer” (“@Kalcifer@sh.itjust.works”). Publisher: [Type: Post. Title: “I just wish more people were willing to try out the alternatives”. Author: “Sunshine (she/her)” (“@Sunshine@lemmy.ca”). Publisher: [“Fediverse memes” (“!fedimemes@feddit.uk”). “sh.itjust.works”. “Lemmy”.]. Published: 2025-01-12T23:12:46Z. URI: https://sh.itjust.works/post/31006865.]. Published: 2025-02-05T03:39:19Z. Accessed: 2025-04-03T08:00Z. URI: https://sh.itjust.works/post/31006865/16502481.
It’s not off-topic when the person in question is involved. […]
As stated in the title, the topic is concerning the AI bots that are spamming GitHub repos [1], not anything to do with nutomic. I personally encountered the bot in nutomic’s repo [2], so I simply used it as a generic example. Given this, your comment feels off-topic, imo.
References
- Type: Post. Title: “There now exist bots that spam GitHub repos with AI generated solutions to issues”. Author: “Kalcifer” (“@Kalcifer@sh.itjust.works”). Publisher: [“Mildly Infuriating” (“!mildlyinfuriating@lemmy.world”). “sh.itjust.works”. “Lemmy”.]. Published: 2025-04-03T01:06:34Z. Accessed: 2025-04-03T05:48Z. URI: https://sh.itjust.works/post/35468786/17744627.
- The title of the post is “There now exist bots that spam GitHub repos with AI generated solutions to issues”.
- Type: Comment. Author: “okFduCi8nl6bRz”. Publisher: [Type: Post. Title: “[Bug] Forking an article triggers notifications to be sent for every previous edit up to the point of forking.” (#129). Author: “Kalcifer” (“K4LCIFER”). Publisher: [“Nutomic/ibis”. GitHub.]. Published: 2025-04-03T00:16:06.000Z. URI: https://github.com/Nutomic/ibis/issues/129 (Alternative (Archive): https://web.archive.org/web/20250403003232/https://github.com/Nutomic/ibis/issues/129).]. Published: 2025-04-03T00:19:44.000Z. Accessed: 2025-04-03T00:58Z. URI: https://github.com/Nutomic/ibis/issues/129#issuecomment-2774030467 (Alternative (Archive): https://web.archive.org/web/20250403003232/https://github.com/Nutomic/ibis/issues/129#issuecomment-2774030467.).
- Type: Post. Title: “There now exist bots that spam GitHub repos with AI generated solutions to issues”. Author: “Kalcifer” (“@Kalcifer@sh.itjust.works”). Publisher: [“Mildly Infuriating” (“!mildlyinfuriating@lemmy.world”). “sh.itjust.works”. “Lemmy”.]. Published: 2025-04-03T01:06:34Z. Accessed: 2025-04-03T05:48Z. URI: https://sh.itjust.works/post/35468786/17744627.
Maybe a joke at the expense of StackOverflow. […]
Yeah, I figured that, but I don’t understand how it’s relevant to the topic of this post.
I’m not sure I understand the relevance of your comment. Could you explain?
[…] Who’s that […]?
I presume they are referring to @nutomic@lemmy.ml [1]; nutomic is one of the main Lemmy developers [1.1].
Context? […] what does he have to do with this post?
If they are indeed referring to @nutomic@lemmy.ml, I presume they are mentioning nutomic because the example GitHub repository that I cited [3] is owned by nutomic [2]; that being said, specifically regarding their claim itself that nutomic is transphobic [4] and is a genocide denier [4], it is entirely off topic, imo.
I will make no comment on the veracity of the claim itself without evidence. I do not wish to speak for nutomic — I will let them speak for themself here should they wish.
References
- Type: Webpage (Profile). Name: “@nutomic@lemmy.ml”. Publisher: [“@nutomic@lemmy.ml”. “Lemmy” (“lemmy.ml”). “Lemmy”.]. Accessed: 2025-04-03T01:58Z. URI: https://lemmy.ml/u/nutomic.
- Biography.
Lemmy maintainer
- Biography.
- Type: Webpage. Name: “Nutomic/ibis”. Publisher: [“Nutomic”. GitHub]. Published: 2025-04-02T14:42:54.000Z. Accessed: 2025-04-03T02:00Z. URI: https://github.com/Nutomic/ibis.
- One can see in the repository identifier “Nutomic/ibis” that it is owned by “Nutomic”.
- Type: Post. Title: “There now exist bots that spam GitHub repos with AI generated solutions to issues”. Author: “Kalcifer” (“@Kalcifer@sh.itjust.works”). Publisher: [“Mildly Infuriating” (“!mildlyinfuriating@lemmy.world”). “sh.itjust.works”. “Lemmy”.]. Published: 2025-04-03T01:06:34Z. Accessed: 2025-04-03T02:03Z. URI: https://sh.itjust.works/post/35468786/17744627.
[…] I recently encountered one of these AI bots in Ibis’s GitHub repository.
- Ibis is the cited GitHub repository.
- Type: Comment. Author: “Deceptichum@quokk.au”. Publisher: [Type: Post. Title: “There now exist bots that spam GitHub repos with AI generated solutions to issues”. Author: “Kalcifer” (“@Kalcifer@sh.itjust.works”). Publisher: [“Mildly Infuriating” (“!mildlyinfuriating@lemmy.world”). “sh.itjust.works”. “Lemmy”.]. Published: 2025-04-03T01:06:34Z. URI: https://sh.itjust.works/post/35468786/17744627.]. Published: 2025-04-03T01:36:27Z. Accessed: 2025-04-03T02:08Z. URI: https://sh.itjust.works/post/35468786/17744627.
Eww Nutomic the transphobic genocide denier.
- Type: Webpage (Profile). Name: “@nutomic@lemmy.ml”. Publisher: [“@nutomic@lemmy.ml”. “Lemmy” (“lemmy.ml”). “Lemmy”.]. Accessed: 2025-04-03T01:58Z. URI: https://lemmy.ml/u/nutomic.
[…] Solarpunk’s Pleasant Politics comm has an automod that bans and unbans based on recent karma ratios. […]
Do they have any documentation for that behavior? If so, could you link it?
Karma does not persist […]
I’m not sure what you mean; if I look at your account, for example, I can see all of your past vote scores [1].
References
- Type: User Account. Publisher: [“geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml”. “sh.itjust.works”. “Lemmy”.]. Accessed: 2025-03-28T02:12Z. URI: https://sh.itjust.works/u/geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml.
- Outlined in red are the vote scores for some of the user’s most recent comments and posts.
- Type: User Account. Publisher: [“geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml”. “sh.itjust.works”. “Lemmy”.]. Accessed: 2025-03-28T02:12Z. URI: https://sh.itjust.works/u/geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml.
[…] I’m sure someone who’s better at maths than me can tell me where the llm has gone wrong. […]
From what I can tell, the math is sound.
I agree with this, in that I think it avoids the issue of appearing to side with one or the other — I think it’s more neutral.