They teach that at Wharton.

The guardian is just cranking out journalism. Quantity first and quality, sure?

Democracy is a participation sport and if you sit on the fucking sidelines you get what you deserve

Have we tried arming insurgents and having them overthrow the Government? Or possibly just a little coup?

Oh. Ok nvm.

The shit show the US just kicked off. Again? Still? I don’t even know.

Or it’s just blatantly stupid. That could be the reason.

Stop resisting

No we didn’t. The president did.

Funny how they write “with connections” instead of just saying “written by” but i guess it’s fine to misrepresent the entire article.

I think i just got to that part of Cult of the Lamb

Translation: agree with me or you are wrong.

You are straight up just using your opinion to justify a point and i won’t have any further part of the conversation.

AIPAC: WE’RE ONLY ASKING YOU TO DO WHAT WE PAID YOU TO DO.

Calling it a monopoly. They didn’t lobby to have the market share. They have competitors who can’t make a product as good. Just calling it a monopoly because you think it’s an easy win in an argument doesn’t just make it a monopoly.

Education. You will never be able to explain taxes in a way that can counter propaganda if the person is an idiot. You just won’t. And until then it’s an uphill battle.

Now we’re just making things up to justify a bad take?

Sorry, they didn’t gobble up existing infrastructure. Comparing them to telcos is just a bad argument.

Maybe it’s just a bad take. Just a hurdurr big tech bad sticker on an argument doesn’t win it for you if your argument is crap.

And there needs to be easier ways to recall.

Coming to America 3: Fascism Boogaloo