He wasn’t killed, his neck just does that
Do we know training data cutoff?
So I guess it can check current sources, but doesn’t by default.
So I guess it can check current sources, but doesn’t by default.
ChatGPT confirmed to be the average voter.
And the current sources waaaaaaas : THE ONION
I mean, it should check current sources, but if it doesn’t get sarcasm how is that going to work? At best it’s just that newbie kid that gets trolled on the first day of work and buying carbon copies for red pen.
I’ve literally asked it to search a website and give me an answer from it, and it makes shit up without searching it. So I call it out and say to search it, it does, and then it’s like oh my bad I just made up that I searched it the first time, but here’s the actual answer after searching it for real. At that point it will quote parts of the page to show it searched it.
Here’s the thing: Kirk and was actually sequestered. The video was AI generated by the left to get conservatives all riled up.
He’s actually in a bunker somewhere protecting Fort Knox gold.
You can’t actually prove he’s dead.
He IS for Knox gold.
The Wendy’s hamburger mothership uses gold energy to remotely Charlie Kirks where they can Charlie the most Kirk.
So how does this differentiate between Charlie Kirk’s? Could it not be conflating with the potentially thousands of other alive Charlie’s Kirk’s?
I think you just lost the Turing test to chat gpt
It’s how these models work. They will assume you mean the most commonly referred to person with that name.
The algorithms will use any context clues you might provide to differentiate but absent those it is basically like using a searching engine and picking the top result.
Maybe he shouldn’t have overdosed on fentanyl of he didn’t want to die.
