A perpetual stew, also known as forever soup, hunter’s pot, or hunter’s stew, is a pot into which foodstuffs are placed and cooked, continuously. The pot is never or rarely emptied all the way, and ingredients and liquid are replenished as necessary. Such foods can continue cooking for decades or longer if properly maintained. The concept is often a common element in descriptions of medieval inns.

Foods prepared in a perpetual stew have been described as being flavorful due to the manner in which the ingredients blend together. Various ingredients can be used in a perpetual stew such as root vegetables, tubers (potatoes, yams, etc.), and various meats.

  • @BlitzoTheOisSilent@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    323 days ago

    Fun fact: ever had soup at a restaurant, and then made it at home but it didn’t taste quite the same or as good? There’s two main reasons:

    1. If it’s a restaurant that actually makes their own soups (versus them being shipped in in a bag to be reheated), they’re very likely using leftovers to make your soup. So unless you’re using the exact same ingredients as the restaurant, it’s not going to taste the same.

    2. The bigger reason being that they likely made the soup you’re eating at least the day before it’s served to you. This gives the ingredients of the soup time to marry, this is that “blend together” they’re talking about. This takes time, regardless of what you’re cooking, but it gives the ingredients the necessary time overnight to just… Become a better soup.

    The leftovers they use have likely been marrying their flavors for a day or two before they’re put into the soup, so all of that blended flavor deliciousness is going to blend even more in the soup.

    • IninewCrow
      link
      fedilink
      English
      273 days ago

      Does this mean that they started the first batch thousands of years ago with Theseus in it?

      • Chaotic Entropy
        link
        fedilink
        English
        19
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        Them’s good eatin’. Add some broth, a potato… baby, you got a stew going.

        • IninewCrow
          link
          fedilink
          English
          63 days ago

          There’s a bit of an aftertaste of tar from his ship tho

      • @superkret@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        23 days ago

        If they boiled a human alive 2000 years ago and then kept dumping out half and filling it back up with broth, veggies and beef every day, would you eat it today?

        • @SorteKanin@feddit.dk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          52 days ago

          I assure you, there would not be a single atom of that human left in the soup.

          Let’s assume dumping half the soup every day for 2000 years. That’s 2000*365 = 730,000 times you’re halving the soup. Assume a human that weighs 70 kg. After the 2000 years, there’d be 70 / 2^730,000 kg left. That’s 0.000… insert roughly 220,000 zeros …0009 kg. I.e. 0, for all intents and purposes. There’d be nothing from that person left in the pot.

        • @humorlessrepost@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          4
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          Only if you bang on the pot to make the water in the soup remember the human essence so eating it gives me invincibility against anything vaguely resembling being man-made.

          Walgreens could make bank selling that.

        • Cethin
          link
          fedilink
          English
          43 days ago

          There’s not enough human to be worth eating anymore.

      • snooggums
        link
        fedilink
        English
        193 days ago

        Don’t do it, that would get you banned from the internet!

            • @spujb@lemmy.cafe
              link
              fedilink
              English
              73 days ago

              yep i made the mistake of conversing with the wrong person in a politics thread and now i’m watching them go through my profile and systematically downvote everything latest to earliest 😅 you would think we are all grown adults on here but many such cases

              • @P4ulin_Kbana@lemmy.eco.br
                link
                fedilink
                English
                23 days ago

                How much recently did this happened? I feel like I’ve already seen you before saying this…

                Well, I guess that now you got a follower!

            • @Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              82 days ago

              If it’s water based, the temperature won’t go over 100 C. Ideally, you’d want to simmer it below that rather than cook it at a high boil. Then you’d just need to make sure there was enough water in it that it wouldn’t all evaporate off while unattended (though more accurately, you’d want enough water to prevent the bottom part from drying out faster than more water can replace it to avoid it burning on the bottom, though that’s not so much a safety issue as it is a quality issue). Or just cover it so that any evaporating water recondenses and ends up back in the stew (though this only really slows the rate at which you lose water, since the pressure buildup will force the cover open and let some steam escape and many covers have a hole to equalize the pressure, so still keep an eye on water levels if you do a long cook).

              If all the water evaporates, then the heat can rise, potentially to a flash point of some ingredient, which would start a fire, which I’d think would be the main safety issue with a slow cook like that, assuming you maintain a safe temperature above 60 C.

              For microbial food safety, cooking over long periods is safer than soaking, generally speaking. It depends on how it is prepared/stored.

              Like canning or jarring could be considered a soak, but you need to seal the container (so no new microbes get in) and cook it in the jar (to kill off any microbes that were already on the food), or use another method that creates an environment hostile to microbes, like make it too salty or acidic.

              Or another option is to deliberately introduce microbes that play nice with our guts and allow it to ferment, which is essentially allowing it to digest a bit outside of our guts. The idea there is that any new microbes that try to move in can’t compete with the existing colony and either die off or maintain a population small enough to not cause harm.

              A long cook is basically maintaining the temperature that canning uses to kill off microbes without then sealing it away from new ones. New ones will arrive but then die due to the heat.

              Note that some foods can break down into harmful compounds if cooked long enough or can contain harmful compounds that require a boil to cook off, like kidney beans. Also if the food already contains heat-resistant toxins, obviously cooking it for a long time won’t get rid of them.

            • @meliaesc@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              32 days ago

              My family in Jamaica make their goat stew overnight. Just leave the fire going. Safe? Probably not, but very widely practiced.

            • @Lennny@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              12 days ago

              Low and slow? Ever had BBQ? If that shit wasn’t cooked overnight, miss me with that shit. (Unless it’s turkey or chicken obviously).

  • @rottingleaf@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    163 days ago

    Only should be really careful about lentils, peas, anything that sticks to the bottom.

    Cabbage is good. Beef is good. Potatoes are good. Carrots - make it go bad a bit faster when not on fire. Same with peas. And of course with onions it’ll go bad very fast.

    • @sushibowl@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      133 days ago

      Carrots - make it go bad a bit faster when not on fire.

      Don’t really know why carrots would make it go bad faster, but the point of a perpetual stew is to never stop cooking it. The fire is always on.

    • @LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      63 days ago

      I followed you until the end. I know near nothing about onions other than their taste and a few cooking techniques. Is there something in them that cause other items around them to go bad quickly?

  • @wjrii@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    373 days ago

    One minor cultural artifact of this general idea:

    Pease porridge hot, Pease porridge cold, Pease porridge in the pot, nine days old.

  • IninewCrow
    link
    fedilink
    English
    353 days ago

    Just don’t scrape the pot too hard when stirring it.

    • Flying Squid
      link
      fedilink
      English
      53 days ago

      I solve this issue by making my perpetual stew in the crater of a tiny extinct volcano.

    • @Vilian@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      43 days ago

      They usually use fire, so less a weaker flame no?, also, just scrape it everytime problem solved

  • Flying Squid
    link
    fedilink
    English
    263 days ago

    Remember: you have to start it cooking by putting in a stone.

    • Mike D.
      link
      fedilink
      English
      93 days ago

      Awesome.

      I was leaving the library over day with my son and looked at the cart of free books. Stone Soup was on that cart and damned sure I grabbed it.

      Gifted it to a friend on their child’s first birthday.

  • @JusticeForPorygon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    103 days ago

    So we’re germs like an issue with this? Or was it okay because it was always kept heated? I mean, obviously they theu didn’t know about germs in the middle ages, but they still woulda been there.

    • @bdonvr@thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      English
      93 days ago

      As long as it is always kept hot then it shouldn’t be any problem at all. It can never be allowed to cool for very long though.

      • @skoell13@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        13 days ago

        So also keep it on while sleeping? Sounds a bit scary. I guess back in the days someone was chosen to keep the fire running anyways but nowadays? Also turnover wouldn’t happen for a few hours.

        • @superkret@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          63 days ago

          Back then the fire in the stove was also what heated your home.
          And lighting fire was very difficult, so you kept it burning.

    • @ryathal@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      53 days ago

      I sure the occasional person was unlucky and got a bowl that wasn’t cooked enough. There’s also a big difference between adding more to an 80% full pot vs a 20% full one for ingredient turnover.