• ClimateChangeAnxiety [he/him, they/them]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    733 months ago

    Hey libs: You do know that if all of your political enemies are endorsing a candidate, that means you should oppose that candidate, right?

    If George W Bush endorses Kamala I will be voting for Trump as harm reduction. “George W Bush is evil” is quite possibly the most solid anchor in my political belief system, and if he supports someone that’s enough for me to vote for literally anyone running against that person.

    • InevitableSwing [none/use name]OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      363 months ago

      if he supports someone

      Libs are amnesiacs. Libs made a lot of fuss that ex office holders like Dubya weren’t invited to the RNC. As if that fact actually matters. Very quietly, behind the scenes - Dubya continues to be horrible. He did his bit to get Brett Kavanaugh onto the supreme court. Libs either don’t know that or don’t care or “forgot”.

  • SacredExcrement [any, comrade/them]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    533 months ago

    1500 and 1600 upvotes for ‘Plz Bush Cheney endorse our smol bean candidate’

    George Bush was quite literally the most openly evil president of my lifetime and that is saying something at this point. Him not having been tried and hung for crimes against humanity is an indictment against America, and him endorsing anything means you should RUN the other way.

    • krolden
      link
      fedilink
      English
      303 months ago

      Ask any liberal and they’ll say he’s a goodan a and wish the republicans were still like him

  • FunkyStuff [he/him]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    393 months ago

    Do libs ever think for a second about how it’s not a good look to be endorsed by war criminals? Is the logic here “wow famous person from the other side of politics is endorsing my candidate which means we can win them over” with no recognition of the mass graves her dad made sure to fill in the name of Halliburton? Or is it even worse, that they do consider the human cost, but think that somehow the 2024 election is so important that those crimes pale in comparison and it makes sense to welcome Hitler into the resistance?

    • barrbaric [he/him]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      53 months ago

      Now that their president is a war criminal they’ve really come around on the issue.

  • DragonBallZinn [he/him]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    363 months ago

    How pathetic, they’re fully embracing being the moderate republicans.

    MFW Democrats are primarily DINOS (because NRINOS or not-republican-in-name-only doesn’t exactly roll off the tongue).

    • vovchik_ilich [he/him]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      263 months ago

      Bush/Cheney

      moderate republicans

      Forgive me for my ignorance as a Spanish person, but how in the fuck is “Illegal invasion of Iraq… I mean Ukraine” guy a moderate? And didn’t Cheney literally get a Christian Bale movie portraying how comically evil he is?

      • DragonBallZinn [he/him]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        213 months ago

        I fear they’re the new moderate.

        We saw in Obama, dems are in no rush to move anything back to the left and George Bush has been all but absorbed by the neoliberal establishment.

        • Belly_Beanis [he/him]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          53 months ago

          neocons

          That’s the exact term, yes. The Bush Doctrine was the apex of their ideology. Neocons were known for advocating interventionist wars and eventually “preliminary strikes.” Reagan’s administration and the Republican Revolution of '94 (when Republicans took the majority in both the house and senate) are also considered neoconservative.

      • nohaybanda [he/him]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        63 months ago

        Why though? That would imply they’re failing to live up to a higher ideal the Democratic Party is supposed to embody, when we all know no such thing exists. They’re all empty soulless suits because that’s what their party wants and selects for

    • barrbaric [he/him]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      23 months ago

      MFW Democrats are primarily DINOS (because NRINOS or not-republican-in-name-only doesn’t exactly roll off the tongue).

      Just call them what they are, fascists.

  • sweatersocialist [comrade/them]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    343 months ago

    omgomgomg W BUSH endorsing the mother of dragons Kamala Harris!!! this is so freaking epic!!! this is just like that scene in avengers when you think the guy is bad but then he’s actually really good!!! (i haven’t seen that movie but i’m sure that happens at some point)

  • CantaloupeAss [comrade/them]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    333 months ago

    Person’s handle is leopard_eater, could not be more on point.

    "The leopards will never eat MY face, I will eat the leopards! smuglord "

  • Wertheimer [any]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    183 months ago

    Don’t the libs love shouting “Disavow! Disavow!” at people? Where are they in that thread?