Unruffled [he/him]M to Fediverse vs Disinformation@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish • 22 hours agoThe New York Times ever being perceived as progressive is the biggest scam ever.lemmy.worldimagemessage-square23fedilinkarrow-up1185arrow-down19file-textcross-posted to: antiwork@lemmy.world
arrow-up1176arrow-down1imageThe New York Times ever being perceived as progressive is the biggest scam ever.lemmy.worldUnruffled [he/him]M to Fediverse vs Disinformation@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish • 22 hours agomessage-square23fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: antiwork@lemmy.world
minus-square@_stranger_@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink1•6 hours agoI’m confused, this is an article from the Washington Post?
minus-square@Aqarius@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink0•5 hours agoYou are confused: it’s an editorial from the Washington Post.
minus-square@Aqarius@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink0•2 hours agoThe root comment of this chain, to which you responded to, is, in it’s entirety: opinion columnist It does not specify a paper. Nor is the practice of employing columnists for opinion laundering limited to the NYT.
minus-square@_stranger_@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink0•1 hour agoSure, but the context of the post is NYT. Feel free to start your own thread about the WP I guess?
minus-square@Aqarius@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink1•44 minutes agoNo, the context is opinion columns. Or are you making the claim that NYT, specifically, does not engage in the practice, unlike WaPo?
I’m confused, this is an article from the Washington Post?
You are confused: it’s an editorial from the Washington Post.
Ok, but isn’t the OP about the NYT?
The root comment of this chain, to which you responded to, is, in it’s entirety:
It does not specify a paper. Nor is the practice of employing columnists for opinion laundering limited to the NYT.
Sure, but the context of the post is NYT. Feel free to start your own thread about the WP I guess?
No, the context is opinion columns. Or are you making the claim that NYT, specifically, does not engage in the practice, unlike WaPo?