Unruffled [he/him]M to Fediverse vs Disinformation@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish • 22 hours agoThe New York Times ever being perceived as progressive is the biggest scam ever.lemmy.worldimagemessage-square23fedilinkarrow-up1185arrow-down19file-textcross-posted to: antiwork@lemmy.world
arrow-up1176arrow-down1imageThe New York Times ever being perceived as progressive is the biggest scam ever.lemmy.worldUnruffled [he/him]M to Fediverse vs Disinformation@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish • 22 hours agomessage-square23fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: antiwork@lemmy.world
minus-square@samus12345@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglish2•5 hours agoOpinion columnist who they saw fit to print. Do you see any opinions there that are examining why the murder has been so widely celebrated, rather than manufactured consent crap like this?
minus-square@imPastaSyndrome@lemm.eelinkfedilink1•edit-22 hours agoYeah? https://www.aljazeera.com/opinions/2024/12/9/no-surprise-americans-are-rooting-for-the-unitedhealthcare-ceos-killer
minus-square@_stranger_@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink4•17 hours agoNo one ever cares here. The NYT does this explicitly to avoid being an echo chamber but, well, people love echo chambers.
minus-square@Aqarius@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink4•16 hours agoYou mean “launder shit they couldn’t in a million years justify publishing otherwise”? This was also an editorial: https://workingclasshistory.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/02.03-irrefutable-Washington-Post.jpg
minus-square@_stranger_@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink1•6 hours agoI’m confused, this is an article from the Washington Post?
minus-square@Aqarius@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink0•5 hours agoYou are confused: it’s an editorial from the Washington Post.
minus-square@Aqarius@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink0•2 hours agoThe root comment of this chain, to which you responded to, is, in it’s entirety: opinion columnist It does not specify a paper. Nor is the practice of employing columnists for opinion laundering limited to the NYT.
minus-square@_stranger_@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink0•1 hour agoSure, but the context of the post is NYT. Feel free to start your own thread about the WP I guess?
minus-square@Aqarius@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink1•54 minutes agoNo, the context is opinion columns. Or are you making the claim that NYT, specifically, does not engage in the practice, unlike WaPo?
>opinion columnist
Opinion columnist who they saw fit to print. Do you see any opinions there that are examining why the murder has been so widely celebrated, rather than manufactured consent crap like this?
Yeah?
https://www.aljazeera.com/opinions/2024/12/9/no-surprise-americans-are-rooting-for-the-unitedhealthcare-ceos-killer
No one ever cares here. The NYT does this explicitly to avoid being an echo chamber but, well, people love echo chambers.
You mean “launder shit they couldn’t in a million years justify publishing otherwise”?
This was also an editorial: https://workingclasshistory.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/02.03-irrefutable-Washington-Post.jpg
I’m confused, this is an article from the Washington Post?
You are confused: it’s an editorial from the Washington Post.
Ok, but isn’t the OP about the NYT?
The root comment of this chain, to which you responded to, is, in it’s entirety:
It does not specify a paper. Nor is the practice of employing columnists for opinion laundering limited to the NYT.
Sure, but the context of the post is NYT. Feel free to start your own thread about the WP I guess?
No, the context is opinion columns. Or are you making the claim that NYT, specifically, does not engage in the practice, unlike WaPo?