Bluesky Post (this was also posted on twitter)

I was hoping to find a statement from the aggressor, but it seems to be too early.

    • @SupraMario@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      64 days ago

      The 1st is there so the government doesn’t step in and create laws prohibiting speech. It’s there to stop the gov from stifling free speech. It’s not there to give you a location to use free speech.

    • @sus@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      if it’s the government that is doing the censoring, against the will of both the users and the private company, how does it not apply here then?

      • @Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -14 days ago

        Where’s that censorship? Show me, please!

        “You’ll be under more scrutiny”

        Ok, perfect, in the end they can’t actually do shit but reprimand then because it’s a private platform. Hell, have they censored Twitter or 4chan? Nope.

        • @sus@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          24 days ago

          There is an implicit threat of government censorship there, even if it is ultimately toothless. And since valve is clearly not the one interested in increasing moderation, your point about the 1st amendment “not applying to private forums” is irrelevant

    • @chillinit@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -8
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      Seems to me it’s quite public because anyone can access their space by simply creating a free account. You’ve seemingly equated the letter of the law to the spirit.

      edit: What the above poster isn’t legally understanding is quasi-public spaces. Ethically, they’re simply failing entirely.

      • @Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        24 days ago

        That’s not the definition of the word public in this context. The sidewalk is public space, a shopping mall is private space, one is managed by the State, the other by a private corporation. Go and do Nazi salutes in a shopping mall and sue them when security throws you out and you’ll understand the difference.

        • @chillinit@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -24 days ago

          That’s not the definition of the word public in this context.

          There you go again with the letter over the spirit. You’d have us replace judges with computers.

          and do Nazi salutes in a shopping mall and sue them when security throws you out and you’ll understand the difference.

          They mall doesn’t have to tresspass a person that’s doing Nazi salutes. If you’d the faintest concept of the ideology of justice as implemented in the US you’d understand the difference.

          • @Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            24 days ago

            I’m explaining how the first amendment works to you, that’s all. Freedom of speech doesn’t apply in spaces owned by private corporations, they can limit your speech in any way shape or form they want as long as you’re on their turf.

            • @chillinit@lemmynsfw.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              -34 days ago

              You keep explaining the letter of the law, poorly, to someone that understands both the law and justice system much better than yourself.

              • @Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                24 days ago

                Don’t think you do buddy! Do you think you can sue a shop owner if they throw you out because you’re saying things they don’t like?

                If you know so much about the first amendment and it doesn’t apply to Internet forums and platforms, how come you’re not rich from suing Twitter or something?

                • @chillinit@lemmynsfw.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  -2
                  edit-2
                  4 days ago

                  All strawman.

                  The shopping mall is not legally obligated to eject the Nazi.

                  But, you think government should force action upon the private entity because the majority disagrees with Nazis.

                  That’s exactly the opposite of why the 1st Amendment exists. Everyone else learned this when they studied why someone can burn the flag or why the ACLU supports Satanists.

                  I’ve no want for your nonsense. And, you do a disservice to others by repeating it. Go learn about quasi public spaces.

                  • @Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    24 days ago

                    You’re the only one who keeps talking about the government here

                    Of course! Big government needs to save us from our 1st amendment rights. Thanks so much. I don’t think I’d have figured it out without your help.

                    No one else is, people are denouncing the fact that there’s a lack of moderation on their forums, they’re not asking the government to intervene.