• @Maalus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    -717 days ago

    You need to lie to the judge under oath to do it. There simply aren’t consequences, but it is very much illegal.

    • AwesomeLowlanderOP
      link
      fedilink
      757 days ago

      Wrong. They try to filter out people who know about jury nullification, but the act itself is not illegal, as you do not have to have the knowledge to accidentally do it anyway.

      • Gregor
        link
        fedilink
        207 days ago

        That seems pretty unfair to filter out people who know about it, it’s basically filtering knowledgeable people.

      • @helloworld55@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        16 days ago

        Just to be clear, one of the standard questions to ask a potential jury is “you must be able to render a verdict solely on the evidence presented at the trial and in the context of the law as I will give it to you in my instructions, disregarding any other ideas, notions, or beliefs about the law. Are you able to do this?”

        If you know about jury nullification, with the intent of using it, then you need to lie under oath to get past this question.

        The question was taken from the New Mexico US courts

        • @Malfeasant@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          186 days ago

          Are you able to do this?

          Ahead of time, I could answer truthfully that I am able. I don’t have to say “but when the time comes, I may choose not to for any reason”

          • @helloworld55@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            -4
            edit-2
            6 days ago

            I mean that may be “the truth”, but it is purposely not “the whole truth”. Which is a violation of the oath. The only way jury nullification is allowed is if a jury independently decides not to convict, because then jury is unbiased in deciding that the law is wrong or shouldn’t apply.

            Again, if you are selected for jury duty, and you already have decided you will ignore the law to avoid convicting the criminal, then there is no way you can make it past the selection without lying to the court.

            • lad
              link
              fedilink
              English
              76 days ago

              I think then talks about jury nullification may be changed in such a way that no legal matter is discussed, but a jury is still inclined to act such that nullification happens, and that will be in accordance to the phrasing of the oath

            • AwesomeLowlanderOP
              link
              fedilink
              46 days ago

              Check the links in the main post. Your example question and many other variations of it are explicitly addressed there.

            • @wellheh
              link
              15 days ago

              Afaik, in a court of law, the questions they ask matter. If it is a poorly worded question, it is the fault of the one interrogating. Don’t answer your own version of their questions

        • AwesomeLowlanderOP
          link
          fedilink
          26 days ago

          Check the links in the main post. Your example question and many other variations of it are explicitly addressed there.

          But in short, you answer truthfully, but stick to the letter of your answer and not what the judge thinks. There’s nothing illegal about it.

    • @_cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      156 days ago

      You do not have to lie to the judge. There is no lying to the judge. If the jury decides to ignore evidence and nullify, the judge knows exactly why, and there’s nothing they can do about it.

      • @helloworld55@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        -86 days ago

        Before being selected to be on the jury, the candidates are asked questions after being sworn in, that almost always include language that would disallow ideas of jury nullification.

    • xapr [he/him]
      link
      English
      7
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      I was a juror in two different trials and don’t recall ever being asked about my beliefs on jury nullification. It’s been many years though.

      Edit: it seems like I was wrong. Supposedly, jury nullification is not legal in my US state.

      Edit 2: perhaps it’s still not completely settled in my state yet?

      • AwesomeLowlanderOP
        link
        fedilink
        86 days ago

        See links in top post. Jury nullification is legal, it is inherently part of how our justice system is structured. However, most judges and prosecutors would much rather prefer you didn’t know your rights, and have outright lied in court about it.

        • xapr [he/him]
          link
          English
          16 days ago

          Thanks. I hadn’t read your link, but found articles giving conflicting case history in my state. It was a quick read of those articles though.

    • @helloworld55@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      -5
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      Why are people downvoting this? Jury nullification itself isn’t illegal, but committing perjury definitely is, which is what Maalus is pointing out