• @ravhall@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    12 months ago

    I never said it made me safe, I just said I have a lot of cameras. You took my comment, added your own thoughts to it, and then attacked me to make yourself feel something inside.

    If it wasn’t misinterpreted, then you’re just fabricating information because you desire an argument.

    Kinda sad really.

    • @Dasus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      12 months ago

      You started this with “thats why it’s important to have a lot of cameras”, to which someone responded “so the cops can shut them off, like they did Afroman’s?”, to which you responded “cops wouldn’t…”

      Then I entered the conversation, because you’ve asserted what cops would and wouldn’t do, showing just how much faith — wrongly, though — you have in the justice system.

      You’re just really hard trying to ad hoc what you said, but unlike in real life, what has been said is actually on record, so bullshitting your way out of this doesn’t work as easily as with your mates in the pub.

      Weird how you yourself commented on the “language barrier” and what you thought was an incorrect use of the English language, yet now have completely shut up about it, almost as if you’re avoiding comparing your language skills to mine. Perhaps because you don’t like feeling stupid?

        • @Dasus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          12 months ago

          It really is weird that you have this pathological avoidance yet obsess over replying here.

          We both know you read it. We both know which of us has more language skills, and we both know what you meant at the start of the thread.

            • @Dasus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              12 months ago

              Yes, that’s why you can’t respond with more than two words, but still have to reply, despite having to also avoid the topics of our language skills and what your comment at the start of this thread meant.