@LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net to science@lemmy.world • 4 months agoThe Theory That Men Evolved to Hunt and Women Evolved to Gather Is Wrongwww.scientificamerican.comexternal-linkmessage-square192fedilinkarrow-up1379arrow-down153file-textcross-posted to: science@beehaw.orgarchaeology@mander.xyznews@lemmy.world
arrow-up1326arrow-down1external-linkThe Theory That Men Evolved to Hunt and Women Evolved to Gather Is Wrongwww.scientificamerican.com@LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net to science@lemmy.world • 4 months agomessage-square192fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: science@beehaw.orgarchaeology@mander.xyznews@lemmy.world
minus-square@ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink11•4 months agoHow does it not? Running 26 miles takes endurance and running it fast takes even more endurance.
minus-squarefafferliciouslinkfedilink7•4 months agoStride length would like a word. Strength, speed, and endurance are related. You’re right. But it’s not as clear as faster time == better endurance.
minus-square@ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink1•4 months agoLonger stride length also equals a heavier body weight to move. I’m sure there’s some sort of graph where the vertex represents the most efficient combination of those factors.
How does it not? Running 26 miles takes endurance and running it fast takes even more endurance.
Stride length would like a word.
Strength, speed, and endurance are related. You’re right. But it’s not as clear as faster time == better endurance.
Longer stride length also equals a heavier body weight to move. I’m sure there’s some sort of graph where the vertex represents the most efficient combination of those factors.