• @TheSlad@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    -74 months ago

    Wristwatches are just jewelry at this point tbh. They’ve been rendered completely redundant by cell phones. The only people under 60 who wear them are doing so as a fashion statement.

    I’m sure a lot of wristwatch stans will downvote me but I don’t care I’m still right

    • The Quuuuuill
      link
      fedilink
      English
      154 months ago

      Ever since college I’ve always worn a cheap watch on my wrist least for the same reason my grandpa stopped keeping a pocket watch: its more convenient to check on your wrist for the time than your pocket.

      Granted we’re getting way off topic here since except for a few years its ways been a digital watch. Asserting analog watches are more numerous in models when digital watches are more numerous in sales, therefore reading an analog clock is a useful skill is odd to me. When I was wearing an analog watch for my allergies it was a flieger because the mental tax of making the hands turn into a singular time was a frustration.

      I learned, though, from this that how you present time changes how you perceive time. Kids who grow up with digital representations of time consider “the current moment” in a much narrower and instantaneous scope than people who grew up thinking of time as being a spectrum on a dial

    • @variants@possumpat.io
      link
      fedilink
      English
      64 months ago

      Watches are just more convenient. You don’t need to carry a phone everywhere and with texts and calls showing on the watch you don’t need to find your phone to check.

      I use my watch with alarms/ timers to know when I need to clock out or in from lunch etc while I mostly leave my phone at my desk while at work so if I’m walking around the building I still get my alerts through my watch

      • ddh
        link
        English
        24 months ago

        Watches that can get alerts can show digital time. So, chalk another point up for not learning analog time.

    • @newfie@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      34 months ago

      Wristwatches don’t have the negative psychologically addictive and anxiety-producing effects of smartphones

    • @curbstickle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      34 months ago

      For office attire or going out, sure.

      If you’re doing repair work, running lines, etc, a watch is the choice. Your hands are busy, so a watch is what you need (Except for specific trades where you don’t want to risk it getting caught in machinery).

      I can say with 100% certainty that I know large swaths of folks in their 20’s and 30’s who regularly wear watches. Some smart, some digital, some analog.

    • @Kalysta@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      14 months ago

      I use my wristwatch all the time to take dogs’ pulses.

      Having a cell phone next to a grumpy dog is asking for a broken cell phone. I’m sure people in other fields need wristwatches as well.

      Just because you don’t use them don’t mean they’re not useful.

      • ddh
        link
        English
        14 months ago

        Also, just because they’re useful doesn’t make them necessary.

    • @flerp@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      14 months ago

      I’m a watch nerd with a collection of mechanical watches and I’m not going to downvote you because you’re right. I wear them because I like them even though I know they are anachronistic. I can’t remember the last time I interacted with somebody significantly younger than me who was wearing a watch, and as I said, I’m a watch nerd, someone’s watch is one of the first things I notice about them.

      I will say that they are occasionally more convenient than other places I could check the time but I’ve built my life in such a way that I very rarely have to care about what time it is and I go weeks at a time without checking the time, just wearing them because I’m fascinated by tiny gears and springs doing their business and I like the feeling of it on my wrist.